Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch

Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>>> Here's an updated version of the psql backslash patch that should
> >>>> apply cleanly to the current HEAD. To recap, this makes all the \dX
> >>>> commands (most importantly to most: \df) work like \dt does, in that it
> >>>> requires a \dXS to see system items. See the archives for much more
> >>>> discussion on the issue.
> >>> Patch applied, thanks.
> >> This patch has annoyed me twice in two days now, and similarly with 
> >> other people I know.  Having to type \dfS now is about the worst loss of 
> >> usability in psql that I can recall.  Can we reconsider or revert this?
> > 
> > Well, \dT is even worse.  ;-)  (How many users have user-defined types?)
> > 
> > The basic goal of the patch was to make 'S' consistent for all \d
> > backslash commands, and we had a lot of discussion about it, and many
> > people asked for it (I can't find my user functions).  It is hard to
> > argue that our previous behavior was logical (though perhaps useful).
> 
> Consistency is nice, but I'm used to typing \df pg_foobar() as well. 
> Could we make plain "\df" list only user functions, but "\df XXX" search 
> for system functions as well? And the same for all \d* commands, for the 
> consistency.

That makes sense;  let me work on that.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +