Re: Multiplexing SUGUSR1

Greg Stark wrote:
> 
> On 7 Jan 2009, at 09:47, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> 
> > Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >> It's required by the sync replication patch, but has no value  
> >> otherwise.
> >
> > Well, we have talked about allowing more signalling long-term, and  
> > this
> > would accomplish that independent of the sync replication, so we might
> > want to revisit this someday if it isn't included in sync replication.
> 
> I also needed this for the progress indicator patch. I used SIGQUIT  
> for the proof-of-concept patch but I wouldn't want to lose that signal  
> for real.

Yep, we want multiplexed signals independent of sync replication.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +