Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090105164549.GG7345@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?
Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut escribió: > James Mansion wrote: >> Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>>> c. Are there any well-known pitfalls/objections which would prevent >>>> me from >>>> changing the algorithm to something more efficient (read: IO-bound)? >>> >>> copyright licenses and patents >>> >> Would it be possible to have a plugin facility? > > Well, before we consider that, we'd probably want to see proof about the > effectiveness of other compression methods. I did some measurements months ago, and it was very clear that libz compression was a lot tighter than the PGLZ code. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: