Re: Copyright update
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Copyright update |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200901012028.n01KSp023127@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Copyright update ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Copyright update
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 14:47 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Andrew Chernow wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Greg Stark wrote: > > > >> Is that actually legal if we haven't modified the files? Or is the > > > >> whole source tree considiered one work? > > > > > > > > One work, I assume. > > > > > > > > > > I am not a lawyer, but if its one work, why is there a notice in every source > > > file? ISTM that if it were one work there would only have to be one notice. > > > > Because people often take source files and copy them for use in other > > projects. > > I think the correct resolution to the question is to ask legal. Yes? So I can get three different answers? It is not a priority for me. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: