Re: PGCon 2008 RFP
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGCon 2008 RFP |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20081229035930.GB30717@shinkuro.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PGCon 2008 RFP (Robert Bernier <robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: PGCon 2008 RFP
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 04:30:59PM -0800, Robert Bernier wrote: > Standardized documentation means it has a life after the conference and will > benefit far more people in a much wider context. A standardized format for presentation materials just ensures that all presentations end up conveying the same overall message, and differ exclusively in the details. I encourage those who doubt that claim to read "The Cognitive Style of Powerpoint", which you can order from http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/books_pp. Indeed, I have been through a number of lamentable presentations, both at Pg conferences and elsewhere, that would have gained tremendously from less conventional approaches to presenting material. (I'm sure there are many who feel the same way after having heard me speak.) There's another issue: many corporations require those presenting under sponsorship of the corporation to use _company_ slide formats. These are just as bad as conference-imposed formats, but they have the notable advantage that they ensure the presenters have funding actually to get to the conference. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@crankycanuck.ca
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: