Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200812191929.16606.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 19 December 2008 05:52:42 Simon Riggs wrote: > BTW, I noticed the other day that Oracle 11g only allows you to have a > read only slave *or* allows you to continue replaying. You need to > manually switch back and forth between those modes. They can't do > *both*, as Postgres will be able to do. That's because their undo > information is stored off-block in the Undo Tablespace, so is not > available for standby queries. Nice one, Postgres. > I think this is true for physical replay, but Oracle also offers the option to do logical replay (where transaction logs are converted into sql and run against the standby; i believe this is similar to what continuant is trying to do with thier latest offering). In that scenario you can do read and replay at the same time, though I think there are some conflicts possible; fewer than what postgres will have, since I think most of thier DDL can be done online. (This might require some extra modules / high end version of Oracle, please consult your local Oracle wizard for more details) -- Robert Treat Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net Consulting: http://www.omniti.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: