Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs
От | Kenneth Marshall |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20081217224757.GX26318@it.is.rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs ("Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>) |
Ответы |
Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs
Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 05:42:41PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Hot Standby won't work with hash indexes because they are > > non-recoverable. > > > > We have a number of ways of dealing with this: > > > > i don't see a reason for inventing the wheel, we don't have wal for > hash indexes because makes those more slow without any benefit at > all... now there will be one... > > -- > Atentamente, > Jaime Casanova > Soporte y capacitaci?n de PostgreSQL > Asesor?a y desarrollo de sistemas > Guayaquil - Ecuador > Cel. +59387171157 > I think having your index survive a server power outage or other crash is a very good thing. Rebuilding a hash index for the case for which it is preferred (large, large tables) would be excrutiating. Ken
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: