Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268)
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200812111943.17326.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268)
Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268) Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 11 December 2008 18:32:50 Tom Lane wrote: > > How can we stick all of these in the same column at the same time? > > Why would we want to? Because we want to use SQL-based row access control and SELinux-based row access control at the same time. Isn't this exactly one of the objections upthread? Both must be available at the same time. We can debate the merits of having, say, SELinux plus Solaris TX at the same time, but if we can have two as per previous paragraph, we should design for several. > I think one column that can hold any of these > ought to be sufficient. I certainly don't care for the idea that we > might invent still a third column for Solaris TX at some future time. Yes, it is certainly more appealing to have one column describing all access rights. In fact, if we extend the ACL storage structure to store external access control information, we might also consider using that for system object access. So instead of adding a column to pg_class for SELinux-controlled access to tables, we just reused relacl.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: