Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements 1202
| От | ITAGAKI Takahiro |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements 1202 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20081210110946.85FB.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements 1202 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Please split this into two separate patches that can be separately > evaluated. Sure. I want to disucuss only where to add counters of buffer usage and cpu usage, or they should not be added. However, it seems to affect future of EXPLAIN ANALYZE, so we might also need to discuss about EXPLAIN. I assume we have 3 choices here: 1. Add those counters to struct Instrument. We can get statistics for each line in EXPLAIN ANALYZE, but it might haveoverhead to update counters. 2. Add those counters only to top instruments (one per query). We can get accumulated statistics for each query. It mightbe unsufficient for complex queries. 3. Should not add any counters. No changes to core, but usability of pg_stat_statement module would be very poor... Which should we take? or are there another idea? Regards, --- ITAGAKI Takahiro NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: