Re: TurnKey security updates
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TurnKey security updates |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200812101042.46566.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | TurnKey security updates (Liraz Siri <liraz@turnkeylinux.org>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Wednesday 10 December 2008 03:31:54 Liraz Siri wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Robert Treat wrote: > >> Since turnkey doesnt update packages themselves (they just grab ubuntu > >> feeds), do they need a contact for the list? Or would that preclude > >> them from being listed on the download page? (I'd also note that > >> Robert Bernier is not on the -packagers list (afaik) , but he now has > >> a distribution listed as well (pg_live)) > > > > Well, does he produce a new release on time for every source release? Or > > is it more like when the conference schedule calls for it? > > Conference schedules? Sorry, we don't have any plans to attend any, so > we have to use a different system to determine our when to do updates. > Peter was reffering to Robert, who maintains pg_live, which is often distributed at various conferences. Robert (now that you are CC'd on this), what is your policy for new releases of pg_live (especially with regards to security updates). > To the point. While new releases do in fact include the latest package > updates as part of the build process, we don't need to release a new > software appliance each time a single package gets updated, because the > package manager is configured to take care of that for you. The > appliance is configured to auto-update security patches daily, directly > from Ubuntu's security repositories. > We also have our own security repository (archive.turnkeylinux.org) but > we only issue updates for our custom packages there. > > This is kind of how Ubuntu and Debian handle updates. You wouldn't > expect them to make a new release for every package that gets updated, > and it wouldn't really be very useful if they did anyhow because it > wouldn't take care of already installed systems. > > Again, I'd like to stress that under the hood TurnKey appliances are > simply an Ubuntu system that has been pre-integrated and optimized to > satisfy a specific usage scenario. > It certainly clarifies your process, now I think we just need to decide what, if any, relationship there needs to be between folks listed on the download page, and who needs to be on -packagers. -- Robert Treat Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net Consulting: http://www.omniti.com
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: