Re: Distinct types
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Distinct types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200811290026.13837.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Distinct types (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Distinct types
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 28 November 2008 18:49:17 Tom Lane wrote: > > * Strong typing is preferable in complex applications to avoid errors > > like sum(ordinal_column). Most developers use this all the time in their > > 3GL code but cannot use it in SQL. > > The problem I see with distinct types is that the typing is *too* > strong --- the datatype has in fact got no usable operations whatever. You are supposed to define your own. It's a new type after all. You only borrow the representation from an existing one. Random example, maybe not the best one: When you create an email type based on text, you don't really want to carry the || operator along, because email || email is not an email (usually). The same applies to substring and pretty much everything else. Domains are not the best solution if you want type safety.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: