Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200811242042.13879.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation ("Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday 24 November 2008 09:10:29 Dave Page wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > > Dave Page wrote: > >> That would defeat the point. Not that I have any great feelings either > >> way, but fwiw, Microsoft and Oracle both create a sample database > >> iirc. > > > > Last I checked, MS did it optionally only, no? > > Yes, but it defaults on iirc. We can emulate that behaviour in an > installer (and do in Postgres Plus for example), but that doesn't help > users of other distributions. > We actually have such a database on pgfoundry already (http://pgfoundry.org/frs/download.php/1719/pagila-0.10.1.zip), which i think devrim may have packaged into an rpm; it wouldn't hurt to add it to the win32 installer, but would you feel better if it were a contrib module or something? -- Robert Treat Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net Consulting: http://www.omniti.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: