Re: Using Postgres to store high volume streams of sensor readings
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using Postgres to store high volume streams of sensor readings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20081122222627.GD3813@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Using Postgres to store high volume streams of sensor readings ("Ciprian Dorin Craciun" <ciprian.craciun@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Using Postgres to store high volume streams of sensor readings
Re: Using Postgres to store high volume streams of sensor readings |
Список | pgsql-general |
Ciprian Dorin Craciun escribió: > I've tested also Sqlite3 and it has the same behavior as > Postgres... Meaning at beginning it goes really nice 20k inserts, > drops to about 10k inserts, but after a few million records, the HDD > led starts to blink non-stop, and then it drops to unde 1k.... The problem is, most likely, on updating the indexes. Heap inserts should always take more or less the same time, but index insertion requires walking down the index struct for each insert, and the path to walk gets larger the more data you have. Postgres does not have bulk index insert, which could perhaps get you a huge performance improvement. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: