Re: [I|S]CONST/[I|S]const in gram.y

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 08:12:49AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Which direction are you hoping to go --- remove Iconst/Sconst, or use
> them everywhere?

For ecpg I don't care, I have to make some changes during translation anyway.
Right now my script just sets both to ecpg_iconst. There is a small advantage
in keeping Iconst/Sconst as it might save me a line or two in the script. As
for the backend I would say that removing Iconst/Sconst make sense. These rules
just add an overhead, albeit a very small one. But still this advantage
outweighs the very small scripting advantage. So yes, I'd remove Iconst/Sconst. 

Michael

-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!