Re: Final /contrib cleanup -- yes/no?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Final /contrib cleanup -- yes/no? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200811071807.mA7I7oK05427@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Final /contrib cleanup -- yes/no? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote: > Tom, > > > I don't recall that having been proposed, and I don't think it's really > > a good idea. We intentionally put those SETs in, not that long ago. > > I haven't been able to find any reasoning on any list why those SETs > where a good idea. Bruce put them in, but apparently without > discussion. Unless you have a link for something I can't find in search? The SET search_path was added to create a consistent install experience for all the /contrib modules. We did kind of talked about it in relation to the file label: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-11/msg00560.php I can't find any specific mention of it but some files had it and some didn't so I added it to all of them. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: