Re: Block-level CRC checks
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20081030151121.GC3857@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Block-level CRC checks (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: Block-level CRC checks
Re: Block-level CRC checks |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek Kotala wrote: > Alvaro Herrera napsal(a): >> Simon Riggs wrote: >> >>> But perhaps writing a single WAL record if you scan whole page and set >>> all bits at once. Then it makes sense in some cases. >> >> So this is what I ended up doing; attached. > > Please, DO NOT MOVE position of page version in PageHeader structure! Hmm. The only way I see we could do that is to modify the checksum struct member to a predefined value before calculating the page's checksum. Ah, actually there's another alternative -- leave the checksum on its current position (start of struct) and move other members below pg_pagesize_version (leaning towards pd_tli and pd_flags). That'd leave the page version in the same position. (Hmm, maybe it's better to move pd_lower and pd_upper?) > And PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION should be bump to 5. Easily done; thanks for the reminder. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: