Re: specificity of claims (was: SEPostgres - on track?for 8.4?)
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: specificity of claims (was: SEPostgres - on track?for 8.4?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20081024174417.GF5539@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: specificity of claims (was: SEPostgres - ontrack for 8.4?) (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:35:13AM -0400, Robert Treat wrote: > > I did no such thing. I simply asked if anyone was looking into > it. There is no suggestion for anyone to go and do it if not, I just > wanted to know if anyone was currently doing it... maybe I wanted to > tell them to stop. Ok, glad to have that cleared up. In the original context, this is what I saw: ---snip--- > > Current status of SEPostgres patch: hopeful, but not assured. > Someone mentioned to me that IBM and Oracle have several patents in this area, is anyone looking into that angle? ---snip--- In my ideolect, responding to "status of patch" with "there's this other issue, is anyone looking into it?" connotes (but does not, of course, denote) that the speaker thinks someone _should_ look into it. I appreciate that perhaps in your ideolect that connotation is not present, and my apologies for misunderstanding you. Best, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@commandprompt.com +1 503 667 4564 x104 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: