Re: Obfuscated stored procedures (was Re: Oracle and Postgresql)
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Obfuscated stored procedures (was Re: Oracle and Postgresql) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080924150518.GA844@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Obfuscated stored procedures (was Re: Oracle and Postgresql) (Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Obfuscated stored procedures (was Re: Oracle
and Postgresql)
Re: Obfuscated stored procedures (was Re: Oracle and Postgresql) Re: Obfuscated stored procedures (was Re: Oracle and Postgresql) Re: Obfuscated stored procedures (was Re: Oracle and Postgresql) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 02:12:19PM +0000, Glyn Astill wrote: > I'm not sure what the policy is on putting stuff in the docs, but > how about putting that in the relevant place, as well as a note > about the other option; using C and SPI. C is not magic obfuscation gear. Anybody with a debugger can expose what it's doing. There have been math papers showing that it's impossible to hide the functionality of a piece of software based only on the ability to run it, so the entire prospect of obscuring the software's functionality when people can send arbitrary inputs to it is one of those "known-impossible" problems like the halting problem. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: