Re: Initial prefetch performance testing
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Initial prefetch performance testing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200809241428.m8OESsi22353@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Initial prefetch performance testing (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Initial prefetch performance testing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ron Mayer wrote: > Even more often on systems I see these days, "spindles" > is an implementation detail that the DBA has no way to know > what the correct value is. > > For example, on our sites hosted with Amazon's compute cloud (a great > place to host web sites), I know nothing about spindles, but know > about Amazon Elastic Block Store[2]'s and Instance Store's[1]. I > have some specs and are able to run benchmarks on them; but couldn't > guess how many spindles my X% of the N-disk device that corresponds > to. For another example, some of our salesguys with SSD drives > have 0 spindles on their demo machines. > > I'd rather a parameter that expressed things more in terms of > measurable quantities -- perhaps seeks/second? perhaps > random-access/sequential-access times? I assume SAN users might not know the number of spindles either. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: