Re: Verbosity of Function Return Type Checks
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Verbosity of Function Return Type Checks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080909151606.GD4223@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Verbosity of Function Return Type Checks (Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo@ttmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Volkan YAZICI wrote: > On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > >> Modified as you suggested. BTW, will there be a similar i18n scenario > >> for "dropped column" you mentioned below? > > > > Yes, you need _() around those too. > > For this purpose, I introduced a dropped_column_type variable in > validate_tupdesc_compat() function: > > const char dropped_column_type[] = _("n/a (dropped column)"); > > And used this in below fashion: > > OidIsValid(returned->attrs[i]->atttypid) > ? format_type_be(returned->attrs[i]->atttypid) > : dropped_column_type I changed it to gettext_noop("the text") and _(dropped_column_type) in errdetail, and committed it. I'd still like to have a better way to word the message, and maybe have this error appear in a regression test somewhere at least once ... -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: