Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080908143240.GD4411@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark wrote: > "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com> writes: > > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> My vote is to reject the patch and work on a config checker. > > > > +1 > > > >> postgres=# set work_mem = '1g'; > >> ERROR: invalid value for parameter "work_mem": "1g" > > > > Perhaps this would be a great place for a HINT listing all > > valid inputs, if not there already? > > It is, I paraphrased it on my original message as: > > HINT: It's perfectly clear what you want but I'm going to refuse to do > it until you type it exactly as I say: "GB" It's good as a joke, but what if the user says '1024b'? Does it mean 1024 blocks or one kilobyte? If blocks, what size are we talking, the usual 512 bytes, or our BLCKSZ? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: