Re: [PATCH] allow has_table_privilege(..., 'usage') on sequences

At 2008-09-06 19:59:55 -0400, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
>
> So I'm thinking it would be better to invent a has_sequence_privilege
> family of functions.

Perhaps.

I certainly wouldn't object to that approach. If there had been such a
function, I would have used it; and, since has_table_privilege doesn't
help me in any released version, I have nothing invested in that way
of doing things.

(I can't help but think that the USAGE privilege is a bit unfortunate.
If granting SELECT rights allowed currval(), INSERT allowed nextval(),
and UPDATE allowed nextval() and setval(), then has_table_privilege()
would have been sufficient and there would be no need to invent a new
set of functions just to check USAGE.

At the moment, however, I have to grant UPDATE instead of USAGE, both
for compatibility with 8.1, and because there is no easy way to check
if USAGE has already been granted, even though I don't want to allow
setval() at all. Pity.)

-- ams

PS. I'm sorry I haven't been able to review any patches this time. I
meant to, but a sequence of unfortunate events conspired to keep me
busy elsewhere. I look forward to participating again next time.