Re: code coverage patch
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: code coverage patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200808281423.24923.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | code coverage patch (Michelle Caisse <Michelle.Caisse@Sun.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: code coverage patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michelle Caisse wrote: > Also, two tests fail with the following diff when the build is > configured with --enable-coverage. > RETURNS trigger > AS > '/home/michelle/trunkClean/pgsql/src/test/regress/../../../contrib/spi/refi >nt.so' LANGUAGE C; > + ERROR: could not load library > "/home/michelle/trunkClean/pgsql/src/test/regress/../../../contrib/spi/refi >nt.so": > /home/michelle/trunkClean/pgsql/src/test/regress/../../../contrib/spi/refin >t.so: undefined symbol: __gcov_merge_add The reason for that problem is that the shared object needs to be linked with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage. (One of these causes -lgcov to be linked, which includes the missing symbol.) This is not done because the shared object link rules don't use CFLAGS. I think for most platforms it would actually be more correct to use CFLAGS in linking. There may be the odd exception, but usually CFLAGS contains some assortment of -O, -g, -W, and maybe -f options, which should do more good than harm when linking. Any concerns about selectively adding CFLAGS to shared library linking rules?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: