psql vs. pgadmin3 was:can't get UPDATE ... RETURNING ... INTO ... to compile successfully
От | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo |
---|---|
Тема | psql vs. pgadmin3 was:can't get UPDATE ... RETURNING ... INTO ... to compile successfully |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080823182831.18b2b4ef@dawn.webthatworks.it обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: can't get UPDATE ... RETURNING ... INTO ... to compile successfully ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql vs. pgadmin3 was:can't get UPDATE ... RETURNING ... INTO ... to compile successfully
Re: psql vs. pgadmin3 was:can't get UPDATE ... RETURNING ... INTO ... to compile successfully |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:34:53 -0600 "Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote: > Glad you got your problem resolved. I have to admit I tend to > mostly use psql to interact with postgres. Nothing against > PGAdmin III, it's good software. I just tend to feel more comfy > scripting things than clicking things. Whether you're using > pgadmin III or psql, it's important that you have the right > version. For pgadmin it's usually best to always have the latest > version, and with psql the one that matches your db. Is there any secret I don't know? I mostly use pgadmin because: 1) It is easier to cut and paste code and results 2) It's easier to open several connections 3) you've the object structure to navigate But I miss psql auto completion. I know I can call an external editor that would make cut&paste easier in psql but I'll lose autocompletion and I've had some issues with pgadmin search&replace and regexp, so I definitively would enjoy psql more... but what about the rest? -- Ivan Sergio Borgonovo http://www.webthatworks.it
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: