Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf

Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> > I'd still like to see us adopt the proposal from some time ago where
> > we stop commenting out the parameters at all, but short of that,
> > hiding options seems about the worst choice we could make.
> 
> Well, there seems to be a very substantial body of opinion that says
> we *do* need to hide "uninteresting" options.  How many are
> "interesting" is certainly open to debate, but as far as I can tell
> most people think it's a short list, not "all of them".
> 
> In short, you're in the minority.

On idea is for postgresql.conf to merely include other files:
include 'sharedmem.conf'include 'compat.conf'...

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +