Re: Re: can't get UPDATE ... RETURNING ... INTO ... to compile successfully
От | Bill Moran |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: can't get UPDATE ... RETURNING ... INTO ... to compile successfully |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080819074324.20cda5bf.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: can't get UPDATE ... RETURNING ... INTO ... to compile successfully (Dale <harris_da@yahoo.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: can't get UPDATE ... RETURNING ... INTO ... to
compile successfully
|
Список | pgsql-general |
In response to Dale <harris_da@yahoo.com.au>: > On Aug 18, 9:23 pm, Lew <no...@lewscanon.com> wrote: > > Dale wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I've got some code which postgres 8.3.3 won't accept. Postgres > > > doesn't like the INTO clause on RETURNING INTO and I've tried > > > following the documentation. > > > > > UPDATE "EntityRelation" SET "Status" = inStatus, "Modified" = > > > Session_TimeStamp(), "ModifiedBy" = UserID() WHERE ("RelationID" = > > > inRelationID) AND ("EntityID" = inEnityID) AND IsEqual(inRelatedID, > > > "RelatedID") RETURNING "Default" INTO oldDefault; > > > > > Does anyone have any ideas if the INTO clause actually works at all > > > for an UPDATE statement? > > > > <http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/sql-update.html> > > does not list an INTO clause for UPDATE, and when you think about it, indeed > > such a clause doesn't make sense. > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/plpgsql-statements.html > > As per this documentation, you should be able to do it. It works for > the INSERT command, but not UPDATE. For the INSERT command, it makes > my code look neater and I image it's more efficient too. Is it possible that your UPDATE command is updating multiple rows? I don't believe RETURNING will work on an UPDATE that touches more than 1 row. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ wmoran@collaborativefusion.com Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: