Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200808151527.m7FFRUu22265@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #4340: SECURITY: Is SSL Doing Anything?
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote: > Dan Kaminsky <dan@doxpara.com> writes: > > Lets talk about the verify_cb callback first: Suppose there's a > > man-in-the-middle between the PG client and the PG server. Is some > > secondary force going to apply some Trusted CA list? > > I'm not sure why we have verify_cb at all -- so far as I can see, > it just specifies the same behavior as OpenSSL's default. Are > you saying that OpenSSL's default verification behavior is broken? verify_cb() is just a throwaway true parameter for the function, I assume. > > Second, are you saying verify_peer doesn't do anything for > > authentication? Are you sure about that? There's really little reason > > otherwise for the call to exist. > > Er, we don't *have* a verify_peer callback. Uh, the user reported running Postgres 7.3 and we have improved SSL quite a bit since then so perhaps an upgrade and reading the current docs would help the user. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: