Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200808121552.m7CFqWW08267@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 10:17 +0200, Markus Wanner wrote: > > What I still don't understand is, why you are speaking about > > "logical" > > replication. It rather sounds like an ordinary log shipping approach, > > where the complete WAL is sent over the wire. Nothing wrong with > > that, > > it certainly fits many needs and I welcome such a solution for > > Postgres. > > Yes, first stage is log shipping. Second stage is either physical or > logical apply. What is the attraction of logical application of the WAL logs? Transmitting to a server with different architecture? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: