Re: DELETE with JOIN
От | felix@crowfix.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DELETE with JOIN |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080808035431.GA11774@crowfix.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | DELETE with JOIN (felix@crowfix.com) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 10:55:17PM -0400, Joe wrote: > I recall a similar problem ages ago and IIRC it was due to Oracle's locking > configuration, i.e., some parameter had to be increased and the instance > restarted so it could handle the transaction (or it had to be done in > chunks). I gather that the general consensus is that Oracle and Postgresql are different enough that I will have to figure them out independently. I have found that Postgresql is more tolerant of operator ignorance, so I had hoped that any Oracle solution would work elsewhere, but maybe not. Thanks for the helpful responses. -- ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._. Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon/ felix@crowfix.com GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933 I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: