Re: DELETE with JOIN
От | felix@crowfix.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DELETE with JOIN |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080807213546.GA11185@crowfix.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DELETE with JOIN (Frank Bax <fbax@sympatico.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 04:01:29PM -0400, Frank Bax wrote: > You mentioned that the process of insert/delete is to be repeated. Are all > the rows that were inserted; the same ones that will be deleted when the > cycle is complete? If yes; then after you delete this batch of rows; add a > 'junky' column and populate with any value different from the default. > Your mass-insert should populate with the default value; and you can delete > based on this value. That would work, and might even be possible, but adding a column just to mark test data doesn' quite sit right. This data is, yucch, tax data, and I have been generating test cases with bogus country names, like Fredonia -- the taxes themselves are in a dozen tables with foreign key references holding them together, one of them being the country name. I was sort of doing what you suggest by using bogus country names, but that's only indirect. To add a column to every concerned table would be a pain for other reasons. -- ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._. Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon/ felix@crowfix.com GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933 I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: