Re: Automatic Client Failover

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dimitri Fontaine
Тема Re: Automatic Client Failover
Дата
Msg-id 200808051245.02387.dfontaine@hi-media.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Automatic Client Failover  (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>)
Ответы Re: Automatic Client Failover  (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Le mardi 05 août 2008, Markus Wanner a écrit :
>  > (Think network partition.)
>
> Uh... well, yeah, of course the servers themselves need to exchange
> their state and make sure they only accept clients if they are up and
> running (as seen by the cluster). That's what the 'view' of a GCS is all
> about. Or STONITH, for that matter.

That's where I'm thinking that some -core smartness would makes this part
simpler, hence the confusion (sorry about that) on the thread.

If slave nodes were able to accept connection and redirect them to master, the
client wouldn't need to care about connecting to master or slave, just to
connect to a live node.

So the proposal for Automatic Client Failover becomes much more simpler.
--
dim

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Pavel Stehule"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
Следующее
От: Zdenek Kotala
Дата:
Сообщение: small improvement in buffread common