Re: Automatic Client Failover
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Automatic Client Failover |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200808051245.02387.dfontaine@hi-media.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Automatic Client Failover (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>) |
Ответы |
Re: Automatic Client Failover
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Le mardi 05 août 2008, Markus Wanner a écrit : > > (Think network partition.) > > Uh... well, yeah, of course the servers themselves need to exchange > their state and make sure they only accept clients if they are up and > running (as seen by the cluster). That's what the 'view' of a GCS is all > about. Or STONITH, for that matter. That's where I'm thinking that some -core smartness would makes this part simpler, hence the confusion (sorry about that) on the thread. If slave nodes were able to accept connection and redirect them to master, the client wouldn't need to care about connecting to master or slave, just to connect to a live node. So the proposal for Automatic Client Failover becomes much more simpler. -- dim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: