Re: Is autovacuum doing a wraparound-avoiding VACUUM?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is autovacuum doing a wraparound-avoiding VACUUM? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080717211044.GR3934@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Is autovacuum doing a wraparound-avoiding VACUUM? (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is autovacuum doing a wraparound-avoiding VACUUM?
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs wrote: > > Is autovacuum doing a wraparound-avoiding VACUUM? > Currently, no easy way to tell. > > Patch to change message of autovac in pg_stat_activity when we are > performing an anti-wraparound VACUUM. I just obsoleted this patch. The new patch should be easier to do though -- just a one line change I think. I don't like your wording though; it feels too verbose (and you're losing the ANALYZE in case it's doing both things). How about snprintf(activity, MAX_AUTOVAC_ACTIV_LEN, "autovacuum: VACUUM%s%s", vac tab->at_doanalyze ? " ANALYZE" : "", tab->at_wraparound ? " (wraparound)" : ""); You're not proposing it for 8.3 right? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: