Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3

David E. Wheeler wrote:
> I guess you're all just blown away by the perfection of this patch? ;-)

The problem is that we're in the middle of a commitfest, so everybody is
busy reviewing other patches (in theory at least).

One thing that jumps at me is pgTAP usage, as Zdenek said.  I understand
that it's neat and all that, but we can't include the tests because they
won't run unless one installs pgTAP which seems a nonstarter.  So if you
want the tests in the repository along the rest of the stuff, they
really should use pg_regress.

It's not even difficult to use.  Have a look at contrib/ltree/sql and
contrib/ltree/expected for examples.

If you want to push for pgTAP in core, that's fine, but it's a separate
discussion.

The other possibility being, of course, that you are proposing citext to
live on pgFoundry.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.