Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version)
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080704173305.GD3893@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek Kotala wrote: > Tom Lane napsal(a): >> I see no value in cluttering the system with useless probes. The worker >> start/stop are the only ones here with any conceivable application IMHO. > > As I answered to Alvaro. I needed to catch start of backend several times > to track call flow or attach debugger. It is possible to use some other > dtrace magic for that, but it is not easy and there is not way how to > determine what kind of process it is. For example how to measure how > many writes performs bgwriter? If you need to attach a debugger to a backend, you can use the -W switch (even on PGOPTIONS if you need it for a particular backend, AFAIR). If you want to "truss" it I guess you can use -W too. Does it have any usefulness beyond that? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: