Re: Hardware vs Software RAID
От | Peter T. Breuer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hardware vs Software RAID |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200806251311.m5PDBNv23559@inv.it.uc3m.es обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hardware vs Software RAID (Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hardware vs Software RAID
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
"Also sprach Matthew Wakeling:" > >> Has anyone done some benchmarks between hardware RAID vs Linux MD software > >> RAID? ... > > The upshot is I don't really see a difference in performance. > > The main difference is that you can get hardware RAID with > battery-backed-up cache, which means small writes will be much quicker > than software RAID. Postgres does a lot of small writes under some use It doesn't "mean" that, I'm afraid. You can put the log/bitmap wherever you want in software raid, including on a battery-backed local ram disk if you feel so inclined. So there is no intrinsic advantage to be gained there at all. > However, not all hardware RAID will have such a battery-backed-up cache, > and those that do tend to have a hefty price tag. Whereas software raid and a firewire-attached log device does not. Peter
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: