Re: Overhauling GUCS
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Overhauling GUCS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200806061439.32335.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Overhauling GUCS (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juni 2008 schrieb Tom Lane: > How far could we get with the answers to just three questions: > > * How many concurrent queries do you expect to have? > > * How much RAM space are you willing to let Postgres use? > > * How much "overhead" disk space are you willing to let Postgres use? This is surely a good start. We could optimize this even more by saying, disk space is cheap, so let's just use a much higher default setting for checkpoint_segments. (If PostgreSQL is installed but not actually used, not all the space is actually going to be used anyway.) Then, increase max_connections a bit; that should be OK for most users. Then you are left with the memory settings, and those need kernel tuning in most cases, so any automation tool loses. Hmm.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: