Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200805292054.m4TKs4O26040@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter wrote: > > What is your justification for denigrating this plan with that? Or > > are you merely complaining because we know we won't be all the way > > there in 8.4? > > Again, just my humble opinion, but given the stated goal, which I > agree with, I'd say it's worth holding up 8.4 until some kind of > out-of-the-box replication advances that goal, where Yet Another > Toolkit Suitable For People Who Are Already Database Kernel Hackers To > Build Replication Systems On Top Of does not. I am confused why we would hold 8.4 when no one said we should hold 8.3 because we didn't have built-in replication. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: