Re: DROP ROLE dependency tracking ...
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DROP ROLE dependency tracking ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080525140108.GD24891@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DROP ROLE dependency tracking ... (Hans-Juergen Schoenig <postgres@cybertec.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: DROP ROLE dependency tracking ...
Re: DROP ROLE dependency tracking ... |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hans-Juergen Schoenig wrote: > when thinking of REASSIGNED OWNED people tend to think about tables > rather than about CONNECT rights. > i would suggest to make DROP ROLE just kill the role unless there is a > real object depending on it. > i would not see a permission to be an object. what do you think? Yes, this might make some sense. (Keep in mind that db CONNECT privileges were invented after REASSIGN OWNED). Perhaps we could make exceptions -- in which case it would be good to investigate which exceptions we need (i.e. for all object types that we support, which ones we should be caring about and which ones we should ignore). I'm stuck in Canuckistan for a week still, so I expect your detailed proposal by when I get back home ;-) -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: