Re: [GSoC08]some detail plan of improving hash index
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GSoC08]some detail plan of improving hash index |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200805161425.51598.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [GSoC08]some detail plan of improving hash index ("Xiao Meng" <mx.cogito@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GSoC08]some detail plan of improving hash index
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Xiao, > Phase 1 seems extremely easy. I'm trying to do it first. > Additionally, I need a benchmark to test the performance. It seems > there's some tools list in > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Performances_QA_testing . Any advice? For a simple test, pgbench is actually going to be pretty good for hash index since it's mostly primary key access. You also might want to write your own unit tests using pgunittest, because you want to test the following: bulk load, both COPY and INSERT single-row updates, inserts and deletes batch update by key batch update by other index batch delete by key batch delete by other index concurrent index updates (64 connections insert/deleting concurrently) You can compare all of the above against b-tree and unindexed columns. For a hard-core benchmark, I'd try EAStress (SpecJAppserver Lite) -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: