Re: Scripting function definitions as SQL?
От | hubert depesz lubaczewski |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Scripting function definitions as SQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080511184325.GA30844@depesz.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Scripting function definitions as SQL? ("Postgres User" <postgres.developer@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Scripting function definitions as SQL?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:28:37AM -0700, Postgres User wrote: > Unfortunately I didn't see a way to tell pg_dump to dump only objects > of a specific type, like functions or sequences. It requires > additional coding to parse the output and that's less than ideal... hmmm .. "additional coding" seems a bit too much for a simple thing like this: pg_dump -s | perl -ne 'print if /^CREATE FUNCTION test_it/../^\s+LANGUAGE/' of course it would be cool to have switch to do it, but hey - it hardly even qualifies as one-liner. it's more "an expression" than code. depesz -- quicksil1er: "postgres is excellent, but like any DB it requires a highly paid DBA. here's my CV!" :) http://www.depesz.com/ - blog dla ciebie (i moje CV)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: