Re: BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200805080220.m482KvR08948@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order ("Aleksej Saushev" <asau@inbox.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly,
that integers are passed in network octet order
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Aleksej Saushev wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference: 4053 > Logged by: Aleksej Saushev > Email address: asau@inbox.ru > PostgreSQL version: 8.3 > Operating system: NetBSD, but this does no matter > Description: libpq documentation should express clearly, that > integers are passed in network octet order > Details: > > The documentation on PQexecParams is silent about the precise format, > expected by server for binary parameters, it should be more explicit > and note that integers are expected in network octet order. This brings up a good question. Exactly how do users know what format _binary_ is? int4 is network byte order, but what about int8, float4, inet? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: