Re: order of entries in admin docs
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: order of entries in admin docs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200805072134.m47LYlY16758@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: order of entries in admin docs (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: order of entries in admin docs
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > Perhaps it would be better to have prose explaining all the stuff > > > structured like Scott proposes, and make the postgresql.conf be just a > > > reference linking to that. I don't think making postgresql.conf be the > > > primary documentation is very nice. > > > > So you are suggesting splitting out the postgresql.conf content into its > > relevant sections and just linking to it? That would work. > > Yes, or something like that. I don't think leaving _just_ the links on > the postgresql.conf would be enough. But a comprehensive, verbose > explanation should be elsewhere; a short blurb and the link would remain > on the postgresql.conf reference. Yea, that's certainly possible, though right now we pretty much have _all_ the information about each configuration value in one place. We would lose that. Looking at the connection postgresql.conf docs: http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/runtime-config-connection.html There isn't much additional text except a description of each item. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: