Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200805071503.m47F3xi10638@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists ("Alex Hunsaker" <badalex@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alex Hunsaker wrote: > > Right, I was assuming once the patch was uploaded it would be to our > > infrastructure and would be permanent. > > Heck, I dont think patch submitters really care. And Ill do whatever > is in the dev faq. > But Its a heck of a lot easier (for me) just to send them in email. Sure, then just keep sending them via email. I often go through several revisions a day as I get feedback and having all that email volume seems wasteful. > Plus it seems awkward to move a discussion thats taking place on > -hackers over to patches... Granted I could post to patches first, > wait an hour then send an email to hackers/reviewer and say hey! > updated patch here! But it hardly seems worth it to me... In fact I > would argue -patches should go away so we dont have that split. The goal is for the patches list to just discuss patches, but often there are user API issues that come up after the patch is submitted, and people often want that discussion on hackers. The current email split can certainly be awkward. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: