Re: Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200804301343.m3UDhdU17162@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Dienstag, 29. April 2008 schrieb Bruce Momjian: > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, 29. April 2008 schrieb Bruce Momjian: > > > > We do look at COLUMNS if the ioctl() fails, but not for file/pipe > > > > output. > > > > > > This is quite a useless complication. Readline uses exactly the same > > > ioctl() call to determine the columns, so if ioctl() were to fail, then > > > COLUMNS would be unset or wrong as well. > > > > I was thinking about Win32 or binaries that don't have readline. > > These rules don't seem very consistent. You are mixing platform dependencies, > build options, theoretical, unproven failures of kernel calls, none of which > have anything to do with each other. For example, if readline weren't > installed, then there would be no one who sets COLUMNS, so why look at it? > If you want to allow users to set COLUMNS manually (possibly useful, see Greg > Stark's arguments), then it should have priority over ioctl(), not the other > way around. OK, two people like it, no one has objected. :-) I will work on making those changes. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: