Re: Protection from SQL injection
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Protection from SQL injection |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080429205520.GF4515@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Protection from SQL injection (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Protection from SQL injection
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 04:33:01PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Moreover, it seems unlikely that it will even cover the field. A partial > cloak might indeed be worse than none, in that it will give some developers > an illusion of having security. I think this is a really important point, and one that isn't getting enough attention in this discussion. Half a security measure is almost always worse than none at all, exactly because people stop thinking they have to worry about that area of security at all. I think without a convincing argument that the proposal will even come close to covering most SQL injection cases, it's a bad idea. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@commandprompt.com +1 503 667 4564 x104 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: