Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> > Hmm. I've preivously been told not to use "Failed to" but instead
> > use "Could not"... Didn't notice that Tom used the other one in his
> > suggestion.
>
> > Tom (or someone else) - can you comment on if I misunderstood that
> > recommendation earlier, or if it still holds?
>
> Oh, yes, "could not" is better. My mistake.
Ok, thanks. Committed new error messages as such then.
//Magnus