Re: pulling libpqtypes from queue
От | tomas@tuxteam.de |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pulling libpqtypes from queue |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080416064854.GA16338@www.trapp.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pulling libpqtypes from queue ("Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pulling libpqtypes from queue
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:57:37AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:48 AM, <tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:48:37AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Alvaro Herrera > > > <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > > > > > I expect you intend to get at least the hooks in, right? [...] > libpqtypes was designed to handle this with our without hooking. (the > 'hooking' debate was mainly about exactly how libpq and libpqtypes was > going to be separated). > > libpqtypes had a superclassing concept (not much discussed on the > lists) where you could introduce new type handlers that wrapped > existing ones and was desgined exactly for things like this. That sounds cool. So in a way you do have the hooks. That would be the libpqtypes without the types, no? > keep an > eye on our upcoming pgfoundry project. I sure will. Thanks - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIBaFWBcgs9XrR2kYRAgHNAJ9L59j9eHw0EkZ5Imzg5txAX1lF4ACcCbgS 6bgw0sejoFlCbHXvV55kimo= =QuvI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: