Re: [DOCS] [SQL] pl/PgSQL, variable names in NEW
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] [SQL] pl/PgSQL, variable names in NEW |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080410075109.069e1e9a@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [SQL] pl/PgSQL, variable names in NEW (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] [SQL] pl/PgSQL, variable names in NEW
Re: [DOCS] [SQL] pl/PgSQL, variable names in NEW |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:45:25 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > > Question for plperl hackers: Should we remove the mention of > > DBD::PgSPI from the PL/Perl manual? > > It seems like a reasonable suggestion to me, since perl database users > probably already know DBD and don't have to learn something new if > they go that way. > > Possibly the text should be reworded, with the mention of DBD::PgSPI > put somewhere else or stuck into a <note> or something. From what I can see on CPAN (unless I am missing something) DBD::PgSPI hasn't been updated since 2004 and is at version 0.2. http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/DBD/ I think it can safely be removed in entirety from our manuals. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: