-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:33:15 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> JD seems to be on record that the existing logging mechanism sucks
> and he needs something else. That's fine, but I think it means that
> we need to improve logging in general, not invent a single-purpose
> mechanism for logging checkpoint times.
Alright hold on. That is *not* what I said. I said *in this context*
an SQL interface would be nicer. I also said that I was willing to
table the entire discussion based on your review of the patch in that
it didn't offer what I thought it did.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH9ZVSATb/zqfZUUQRAhDJAJ49gMASDA40N9ydhzTTaMBdr/KccQCfei3d
4QXp/4C6iH7GXatqwU5qnuk=
=slQS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----