Re: advancing snapshot's xmin
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: advancing snapshot's xmin |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080328150509.GO7464@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: advancing snapshot's xmin (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: advancing snapshot's xmin
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > > As far as I can see, for the purposes of VACUUM we can remove any tuple > > that was deleted after the old transaction's Xid but before that > > transaction's Xmin (i.e. all of its live snapshots). This means we get > > to ignore Xid in GetOldestXmin and in the TransactionXmin calculations > > in GetSnapshotData. It would not surprise me, however, to find out that > > I am overlooking something and this is incorrect. > > This seems entirely off-base to me. In particular, if a transaction > has an XID then its XMIN will never be greater than that, so I don't > even see how you figure the case will arise. My point exactly -- can we let the Xmin go past its Xid? You imply we can't, but why? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: